Use BOOST_ASSERT instead of a private assert macro for span#189
Open
Use BOOST_ASSERT instead of a private assert macro for span#189
Conversation
Member
|
I would rather just drop GCC 4 support in span instead. (In +2 releases after announcing it) |
Member
Author
|
One does not preclude the other. |
Member
|
Adding the asserts in the way I did was a non-breaking change. The first breaking change I want to make is dropping GCC 4 support. I'm happy to make it sooner. (Until then I'm fine with GCC 4 users not having asserts) |
Member
Author
|
It's not a breaking change if it doesn't break anything. :-) |
Member
Author
|
Regardless of whether this is applied, develop needs to be merged to master.
That's fine in principle, but in this specific case, |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of removing assertions under GCC 4.x to retain constexpr support, this retains the assertions and removes constexpr support under GCC 4.x instead. The presumption is that GCC 4.x users care more about assertions than they care about constexpr (which is hardly useful there anyway.)