-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 167
Expanding Flexible Factors Grant Android Support #896
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
utkrishtsahu
merged 11 commits into
main
from
SDK-6405-Expanding-Flexible-Factors-Grant-Android-Support
Feb 6, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6d118ad
implementation flexible grant support for android
utkrishtsahu fcb804d
Merge main into SDK-6405-Expanding-Flexible-Factors-Grant-Android-Sup…
utkrishtsahu d19f90e
Addressed review comments and annded UT cases
utkrishtsahu 52bc78d
Merge main into SDK-6405-Expanding-Flexible-Factors-Grant-Android-Sup…
utkrishtsahu 2b1b511
Using Sealed class for enroll and verify for cross platform sdk consi…
utkrishtsahu 923967f
Reorganize private methods, fix nullable fields, add CredentialsManag…
utkrishtsahu 0ec834b
-Sadding updated Example.md file
utkrishtsahu 2cf87a2
docs: Align MFA examples
utkrishtsahu c1a8b57
refactor: organize MFA classes into authentication.mfa package
utkrishtsahu dc3c8fb
clean up MFA tests per review feedback
utkrishtsahu 416e1c2
Merge branch 'main' into SDK-6405-Expanding-Flexible-Factors-Grant-An…
utkrishtsahu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR description lists the new API as
AuthenticationAPIClient.mfa(mfaToken), but the implementation addsmfaClient(mfaToken). Please align the public API naming with the PR description (either rename the method or update the PR description/docs to match).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The implementation uses mfaClient(mfaToken) consistently throughout the SDK, docs (EXAMPLES.md), and sample app. This naming is more explicit and follows the pattern of returning a client object.