-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
feat(actors): enables standby mode via actor.json #991
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
l2ysho
merged 10 commits into
master
from
913-actorjson-option-usesstandbymode-does-not-work
Jan 28, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bcb8702
feat(actors): enables standby mode via actor.json
l2ysho 98e9f79
chore(actors): fix tests and remove unused type
l2ysho ffbf2f9
chore(tests): fix path in tests
l2ysho dd47acb
Ffx(actors): corrects standby mode behavior
l2ysho 3b686b1
refactor: remove defaults for standBy
l2ysho b1ac83e
Merge branch 'master' into 913-actorjson-option-usesstandbymode-does-…
l2ysho f97a2e4
chore: updates apify-client to v2.22.0
l2ysho 62da62e
Merge branch 'master' into 913-actorjson-option-usesstandbymode-does-…
l2ysho 46c4310
Merge branch 'master' into 913-actorjson-option-usesstandbymode-does-…
l2ysho dcc824d
Chore: updates apify-client dependency
l2ysho File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just calling out, not blocking: This will only enable standby on new actors, and it will NOT propagate to existing ones (say if you migrate from ??? -> standby, or vice versa)
Maybe this is something we want to do? @B4nan Or should it be a different command, like
actors edit?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, good point, no strong opinions, I wouldn't add a new command for that (we don't have
actors edit, or do we?)(I wouldn't block the PR on that, it can happen in a future one, or even never if nobody really asks for it)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean, there are other cases already where changing something in the
actor.jsonfile for an existing Actor doesn't change the "platform-side version" of the Actor, so... Ostrich algorithm?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah agreed, lets leave that for
laternever.