Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented Dec 29, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier (source) 4.2.44.3 age confidence

Release Notes

jqno/equalsverifier (nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier)

v4.3

Changed
  • Restored original behaviour for multiple predicate-based ScanOption exceptions. (Issue 1167; thanks Mark!)

v4.2.6

Fixed
  • If first permitted and non-abstract subclass of a sealed type has a recursion, EqualsVerifier throws RecursionException instead of trying the second permitted non-abstract subclass. (Issue 1081)
Changed
  • Avoids potential parameter order bug when instantiating records. (Issue 1160; thanks lycoris106!)
  • More performance improvements.

v4.2.5

Changed
  • Improved performance: EqualsVerifier will now run slightly faster. (Issue 1156)
  • Refactorings in the internal class instantiation logic.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every 3 weeks on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate-bot renovate-bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier to v4.2.5 fix(deps): update dependency nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier to v4.3 Jan 12, 2026
@renovate-bot renovate-bot force-pushed the renovate/nl.jqno.equalsverifier-equalsverifier-4.x branch from 1c37ef0 to 15c3584 Compare January 12, 2026 07:07
@vlsi vlsi merged commit eaa9497 into apache:master Jan 12, 2026
5 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants