Skip to content

Conversation

@jembishop
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

Didn't make an issue sorry. Very small change.

What changes are included in this PR?

After upgrading to v2 table I got complaints that this field does not exist, so
Added a default for sequence number for this struct.

I think this should be ok, as this is treated as 0 for iceberg v1 wrt to v2 compat in other contexts? But would like some confirmation.

Are these changes tested?

Tested that it fixes my problem, yes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant