infra: use new del_branch_on_merge in .asf.yaml
#2788
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ebyhr
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2025
geruh
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2025
Contributor
geruh
left a comment
geruh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this Kevin! I was wondering why I had to manually cleanup now
Fokko
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2025
Contributor
Fokko
left a comment
Fokko
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice one @kevinjqliu this is a great one, thanks @ebyhr and @geruh for the review 🙌
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Previous use of
del_branch_on_mergeis deprecated, https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#delete-branch-on-merge
New way is to
https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#pull_requests
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?