-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
fix: regression of dict_id in physical plan proto
#20063
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kumarUjjawal
wants to merge
3
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
kumarUjjawal:fix/dict_id_regression
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -2566,6 +2566,25 @@ fn custom_proto_converter_intercepts() -> Result<()> { | |
| Ok(()) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. With the code change reverted, this test fails like ---- cases::roundtrip_physical_plan::roundtrip_call_null_scalar_struct_dict stdout ---- |
||
| fn roundtrip_call_null_scalar_struct_dict() -> Result<()> { | ||
| let data_type = DataType::Struct(Fields::from(vec![Field::new( | ||
| "item", | ||
| DataType::Dictionary(Box::new(DataType::UInt32), Box::new(DataType::Utf8)), | ||
| true, | ||
| )])); | ||
|
|
||
| let schema = Arc::new(Schema::new(vec![Field::new("a", data_type.clone(), true)])); | ||
| let scan = Arc::new(EmptyExec::new(Arc::clone(&schema))); | ||
| let scalar = lit(ScalarValue::try_from(data_type)?); | ||
| let filter = Arc::new(FilterExec::try_new( | ||
| Arc::new(BinaryExpr::new(scalar, Operator::Eq, col("a", &schema)?)), | ||
| scan, | ||
| )?); | ||
|
|
||
| roundtrip_test(filter) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /// Test that expression deduplication works during deserialization. | ||
| /// When the same expression Arc is serialized multiple times, it should be | ||
| /// deduplicated on deserialization (sharing the same Arc). | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like somehow I missing something key -- this seems like a pretty massive overhead to create / decode a single value here.
That being said, it seems like the existing code is also doing the overhead, so maybe it is fine for now 🤔
I wonder if we could pull this logic for creating the schema into its own function to try and reduce the size of the overall method / make it easier to understand