-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
perf: Improve string expression microbenchmarks #3012
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3012 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 56.12% 59.55% +3.43%
- Complexity 976 1379 +403
============================================
Files 119 167 +48
Lines 11743 15496 +3753
Branches 2251 2569 +318
============================================
+ Hits 6591 9229 +2638
- Misses 4012 4970 +958
- Partials 1140 1297 +157 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
mbutrovich
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @andygrove!
| StringExprConfig("rpad", "select rpad(c1, 120, 'x') from parquetV1Table"), | ||
| StringExprConfig("chr", "select chr(c1) from parquetV1Table"), | ||
| StringExprConfig("concat", "select concat(c1, c1) from parquetV1Table"), | ||
| StringExprConfig("concatws", "select concat_ws(' ', c1, c1) from parquetV1Table"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That seems like a good catch.
Which issue does this PR close?
Part of #2955
Rationale for this change
Improve coverage of string expression benchmarks.
What changes are included in this PR?
How are these changes tested?