MINOR: Update versions in LICENSE/NOTICE

[jbonofre]

Align versions in LICENSE/NOTICE in regards of the recent dependency updates.

[kou]

It seems that https://github.com/apache/arrow-java/tree/main/flight/flight-sql-jdbc-driver doesn't include copy of part of Netty. Do we need this? (Or should we change this to "This binary artifact contains ..."?)

[jbonofre]

JDBC driver actually shades Netty (using org/apache/arrow/driver/jdbc/shaded relocation).
For instance:

$ jar tvf flight-sql-jdbc-driver-19.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar|grep -i netty
...
org/apache/arrow/driver/jdbc/shaded/io/netty/handler/codec/http2/Http2FrameLogger$Direction.class
org/apache/arrow/driver/jdbc/shaded/io/netty/handler/codec/http2/Http2Exception$ClosedStreamCreationException.class
org/apache/arrow/driver/jdbc/shaded/io/netty/handler/codec/http2/Http2FrameCodec.class
org/apache/arrow/driver/jdbc/shaded/io/netty/handler/codec/http2/Http2PushPromiseFrame.class
...

[jbonofre]

https://github.com/apache/arrow-java/blob/main/flight/flight-sql-jdbc-driver/pom.xml#L120

[kou]

I'm not familiar with Java but I thought flight-sql-jdbc-driver-19.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar is a binary artifact not a source archive. (I thought that https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/arrow/flight-sql-jdbc-driver/18.2.0/flight-sql-jdbc-driver-18.2.0-sources.jar is a source archive for flight-sql-jdbc-driver.)

We use "This binary artifact contains ..." in other files for binary artifact and we use "This product includes ..." for copied sources. e.g.:

arrow-java/LICENSE.txt

Line 205 in cf8b252

This product includes code from Netty 4.1.117.Final:

So I thought:

• We don't need this for source archive?
• We should use "This binary artifact ..."?

BTW, I noticed that this isn't used for -sources.jar! This is used only for .jar, right?

[jbonofre]

We have to ship LICENSE and NOTICE in the jar. That's why these files are in the shaded folder. And LICENSE has to list of dependencies shaded/shipped in the distributed artifact.

[kou]

+1