Skip to content

Weekly s390x Job#1496

Open
SanyogDeshmukh wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
linux-on-ibm-z:s390x-ci
Open

Weekly s390x Job#1496
SanyogDeshmukh wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
linux-on-ibm-z:s390x-ci

Conversation

@SanyogDeshmukh
Copy link

Added weekly s390x job which triggers on every Sunday.

@SanyogDeshmukh
Copy link
Author

@mattrpav as discussed here, this PR implements the proposed change.

@SanyogDeshmukh
Copy link
Author

@mattrpav Did you get a chance to look into this?

@jeanouii
Copy link
Contributor

@SanyogDeshmukh we are moving out of jenkins to favor Github Actions. Can we do the same with Github Actions?

@mattrpav
Copy link
Contributor

@jeanouii does GH action support s390x now?

@jeanouii
Copy link
Contributor

@mattrpav I have no idea and that's why I was asking

@jbonofre
Copy link
Member

No GitHub Action doesn't have executor for s390x. That's why the idea is to still have Jenkins (on demand) specifically about s390x.

@rposts
Copy link

rposts commented Feb 12, 2026

@mattrpav We now have hosted GHA actions runners available for IBM Z and gradually onboarding opensource communities to utilize it as we work on expanding the capacity. I had mentioned it in this PR. Is this something community is willing to explore? Thanks!

@mattrpav
Copy link
Contributor

mattrpav commented Feb 12, 2026

@rposts ActiveMQ is interested in trying out the s390x GH Action, but I'm not sure it is our call alone-- might require Apache Infra sign-off. @jbonofre insights?

@jbonofre
Copy link
Member

@rposts thanks for the updated ! Yes, definitely, @mattrpav is right: we are interesting to use s390x with GH (I would be happy to remove completely Jenkins).
Let me create another PR to test s390x in GH Action (in ActiveMQ CI).
Thanks !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants