Skip to content

Conversation

@capcom6
Copy link
Member

@capcom6 capcom6 commented May 31, 2025

Potential fix for https://github.com/android-sms-gateway/client-php/security/code-scanning/1

To fix the issue, we need to add a permissions block to the workflow file. Since the workflow performs basic CI tasks (checking out code, installing dependencies, and running tests), the minimal required permission is contents: read. This ensures that the GITHUB_TOKEN has only the necessary access to repository contents and avoids granting unnecessary write permissions.

The permissions block should be added at the root level of the workflow file to apply to all jobs in the workflow. This is the most efficient approach since all jobs in the workflow appear to have similar permission requirements.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated CI pipeline configuration to enhance repository permission settings. No impact on user-facing features.

…n permissions

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 31, 2025

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow configuration was updated to include a permissions section, explicitly granting the workflow read access to repository contents. No other aspects of the workflow, such as job definitions or steps, were changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yml Added permissions section with contents: read.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c73ad6 and 9b1d1b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)

6-7: Restrict GITHUB_TOKEN to least privilege
Adding the root-level permissions block with contents: read correctly scopes the workflow’s token to only read access, satisfying the security alert without impacting existing jobs.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@capcom6 capcom6 marked this pull request as ready for review May 31, 2025 08:38
@capcom6 capcom6 merged commit 424cfe5 into master May 31, 2025
6 checks passed
@capcom6 capcom6 deleted the alert-autofix-1 branch May 31, 2025 11:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants