Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
AndyTWF
force-pushed
the
chat-webhook-moderation
branch
from
157b57c to
ce6077f
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@ably/team-deved This is ready for review, but have kept in draft until we're ready to merge. |
m-hulbert
reviewed
Feb 6, 2026
| --- | ||
| title: Webhook | ||
| meta_description: "Detect and remove unwanted content in a Chat Room using a custom webhook endpoint." | ||
| --- |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you add a meta_keywords please?
Comment on lines
+10
to
+12
| * Integrate with a custom moderation service hosted on your own infrastructure | ||
| * Implement your own moderation logic using any web server or serverless platform | ||
| * Use a moderation provider that isn't directly supported by Ably |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| * Integrate with a custom moderation service hosted on your own infrastructure | |
| * Implement your own moderation logic using any web server or serverless platform | |
| * Use a moderation provider that isn't directly supported by Ably | |
| * Integrate with a custom moderation service hosted on your own infrastructure. | |
| * Implement your own moderation logic using any web server or serverless platform. | |
| * Use a moderation provider that isn't directly supported by Ably. |
Comment on lines
+35
to
+40
| * Keep your endpoint response time as low as possible to minimize latency | ||
| * Implement proper error handling and logging | ||
| * Consider implementing rate limiting if you're using a third-party moderation service | ||
| * Use HTTPS to encrypt data in transit | ||
| * Authenticate requests using the headers field to prevent unauthorized access to your endpoint | ||
| * Consider implementing caching for frequently occurring content |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| * Keep your endpoint response time as low as possible to minimize latency | |
| * Implement proper error handling and logging | |
| * Consider implementing rate limiting if you're using a third-party moderation service | |
| * Use HTTPS to encrypt data in transit | |
| * Authenticate requests using the headers field to prevent unauthorized access to your endpoint | |
| * Consider implementing caching for frequently occurring content | |
| * Keep your endpoint response time as low as possible to minimize latency. | |
| * Implement proper error handling and logging. | |
| * Consider implementing rate limiting if you're using a third-party moderation service. | |
| * Use HTTPS to encrypt data in transit. | |
| * Authenticate requests using the headers field to prevent unauthorized access to your endpoint. | |
| * Consider implementing caching for frequently occurring content. |
Comment on lines
+35
to
+40
| * Keep your endpoint response time as low as possible to minimize latency | ||
| * Implement proper error handling and logging | ||
| * Consider implementing rate limiting if you're using a third-party moderation service | ||
| * Use HTTPS to encrypt data in transit | ||
| * Authenticate requests using the headers field to prevent unauthorized access to your endpoint | ||
| * Consider implementing caching for frequently occurring content |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is 'frequently occurring content' a thing in moderation OOI?
I think 'reoccurring' might read better if so.
| When implementing your webhook endpoint, consider the following: | ||
|
|
||
| * Keep your endpoint response time as low as possible to minimize latency | ||
| * Implement proper error handling and logging |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we mention about how to view errors from our side?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
CHA-1242
Checklist