Add fuzzing support for relaxed atomics #8253
Merged
+47
−43
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stevenfontanella
force-pushed
the
fuzzing
branch
from
cb21412 to
f4c43d5
Compare
stevenfontanella
force-pushed
the
fuzzing
branch
from
f4c43d5 to
2fa281d
Compare
kripken
reviewed
Jan 30, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #8165. We already don't run v8 fuzz handlers for relaxed atomics (link) since this feature isn't implemented in V8 yet. To test, ran
fuzz_opt.pyfor ~1 hour with no failures.