Skip to content

Conversation

@Stivo182
Copy link
Owner

@Stivo182 Stivo182 commented Dec 15, 2025

  • winow: 0.11.0 → 0.11.2
    (repo · hub)

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The winow dependency version in the packagedef manifest is updated from 0.11.0 to 0.11.2. This is a patch-level version increment with no other structural or behavioral modifications.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Version Update
packagedef
Updated winow dependency from version 0.11.0 to 0.11.2

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Single-line dependency version bump with no logic changes
  • No additional dependencies or structural modifications

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A tiny hop, a version tweak,
From point-one-oh to point-one-two we seek,
The winow winds now blow fresher still,
With bugfixes bundled, of that I feel the thrill! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and accurately describes the main change: a dependency version bump for the 'winow' package from 0.11.0 to 0.11.2, which matches the raw summary and PR objectives perfectly.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch depos/bump-deps/latest

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67ee641 and 4bbf944.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packagedef (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
  • GitHub Check: test (stable) / build (ubuntu-latest, stable, 1testrunner)
  • GitHub Check: test (dev) / build (ubuntu-latest, dev, 1testrunner)
  • GitHub Check: test (stable) / build (macos-latest, stable, 1testrunner)
  • GitHub Check: test (dev) / build (macos-latest, dev, 1testrunner)
  • GitHub Check: test (stable) / build (windows-latest, stable, 1testrunner)
  • GitHub Check: test (dev) / build (ubuntu-latest, dev, 1testrunner)
  • GitHub Check: test (stable) / build (ubuntu-latest, stable, 1testrunner)
  • GitHub Check: test (stable) / build (macos-latest, stable, 1testrunner)
  • GitHub Check: test (stable) / build (windows-latest, stable, 1testrunner)
  • GitHub Check: sonar / test

.ЗависитОт("autumn", "4.3.11")
.ЗависитОт("autumn-cli", "1.2.0")
.ЗависитОт("winow", "0.11.0")
.ЗависитОт("winow", "0.11.2")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🌐 Web query:

winow oscript library 0.11.2 release notes changelog

💡 Result:

I searched for the Winow (OneScript) library changelog for version 0.11.2 but could not find any release or release-notes for v0.11.2. The project's GitHub releases and aggregator pages show releases up to v0.11.0 (and earlier tags) but no v0.11.2 entry I could locate. Sources checked:

  • Winow GitHub / releases (project overview). [1]
  • NewReleases aggregated Winow release list (shows v0.10.0 → v0.11.0 entries). [2]
  • Autumn-library / Winow release history entries. [3]

If you want, I can:

  • fetch the project's GitHub releases page directly and paste the changelog entries for the latest release available, or
  • keep searching (including Russian-language mirrors and package registries) for any mention of v0.11.2 and return exact release notes if found.

Which would you prefer?

Sources:
[1] https://github.com/autumn-library/winow (project page).
[2] https://newreleases.io/project/github/autumn-library/winow (release listings).
[3] https://newreleases.io/project/github/autumn-library/winow/release/v0.9.6 (example release entry).


🏁 Script executed:

# Check if we can find any information about winow in a repository
git ls-files | head -20

Repository: Stivo182/oscript-httpbin

Length of output: 552


🏁 Script executed:

# Get the packagedef file to see the current dependency
cd /tmp && git clone https://github.com/Stivo182/oscript-httpbin.git 2>&1 | grep -E "(Cloning|done)" || true
cat /tmp/oscript-httpbin/packagedef | grep -i winow

Repository: Stivo182/oscript-httpbin

Length of output: 135


🌐 Web query:

autumn-library winow GitHub releases latest version

💡 Result:

The latest GitHub release is v0.11.0 — released Sep 19, 2025. [1][2]

Sources:
[1] autumn-library/winow releases (GitHub).
[2] autumn-library/winow release listing (NewReleases).


Dependency version does not exist — PR cannot be merged.

Version 0.11.2 of winow does not exist in the autumn-library/winow repository. The latest available release is v0.11.0 (released September 19, 2025). Update the packagedef to a valid version or remove this change.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packagedef around line 16, the dependency line references a non-existent
winow version "0.11.2"; replace it with a valid published version (e.g.,
"0.11.0") or remove the dependency change. Confirm the chosen version exists in
the autumn-library/winow repo (or adjust to the correct tag) and update the
.ЗависитОт entry accordingly so the package uses a released version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants