Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <fkr@hazardous.org>
Signed-off-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <fkr@hazardous.org>
Signed-off-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <fkr@hazardous.org>
Signed-off-by: Felix Kronlage-Dammers <fkr@hazardous.org>
|
Does it makes sense to also remove all of the old VP groups? |
garloff
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2025
Member
garloff
left a comment
garloff
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/lgtm
The question is whether we want to keep historic data, so we could have "Historic SCS project team @ OSBA" (which would also include Eduard then) or the work packages (VPs).
I see no really good reason for it, so I would support @berendt 's proposal to remove the VP groups next.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.