Skip to content

SONARJAVA-6122 Change the implementation of S3078 to cover more operations#5509

Merged
aurelien-coet-sonarsource merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
ac/SONARJAVA-6122
Mar 5, 2026
Merged

SONARJAVA-6122 Change the implementation of S3078 to cover more operations#5509
aurelien-coet-sonarsource merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
ac/SONARJAVA-6122

Conversation

@aurelien-coet-sonarsource
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@hashicorp-vault-sonar-prod
Copy link
Contributor

hashicorp-vault-sonar-prod bot commented Mar 4, 2026

SONARJAVA-6122

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this PR does not build. Could you please fix it?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should discuss this offline?

@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm wondering if we should update RSpec. If you want to do this, then please finish Rspec and add it here before merging.

I'm totally fine not doing it though, because volatile fields are a rarely used feature and this ticket is something we found internally, without any user feedback.

@aurelien-coet-sonarsource aurelien-coet-sonarsource merged commit 287cdd4 into master Mar 5, 2026
27 of 28 checks passed
@aurelien-coet-sonarsource aurelien-coet-sonarsource deleted the ac/SONARJAVA-6122 branch March 5, 2026 12:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants