Conversation
| * @param {Number} version - version of ghost data | ||
| * @param {Object} data - object literal to save as this ghost's data for this version | ||
| * @returns {Promise<Ghost>} - the ghost for this object | ||
| */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what's going on here? are these missing or is the JSDoc comment supposed to indicate that the functions exist?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The functions appear to be missing. I think this is the only Flow typed file that tries to use a GhostStore and the only method it needs is GhostStore.get.
Once this interface is moved to the proper location (a Flow typed Bucket or Channel module perhaps) the missing interface methods would have failed the type checker.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ha, I event wrote as much over a year ago:
The GhostStore type is currently located in the LocalQueue module because it is the only one using that type definition at this moment. It will need a better home when the Channel module gets flowtyped but I think we can cross that bridge when we tackle the Channel changes.
2 participants
Extracts and flowtypes the
Queueclasses fromChannel.No application logic is changed other than adding some null checks where flow complains (rightfully so).
The
GhostStoretype is currently located in theLocalQueuemodule because it is the only one using that type definition at this moment. It will need a better home when theChannelmodule gets flowtyped but I think we can cross that bridge when we tackle theChannelchanges.