Fix out-of-order return in ATF step snippet

[michael-albinson-sn]

PR Description:

This would cause the output message of the step to not be set correctly in the success case

Pull Request Checklist

Overview

• I have read and understood the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines
• My pull request has a descriptive title that accurately reflects the changes
• I've included only files relevant to the changes described in the PR title and description
• I've created a new branch in my forked repository for this contribution

Code Quality

• My code is relevant to ServiceNow developers
• My code snippets expand meaningfully on official ServiceNow documentation (if applicable)
• I've disclosed use of ES2021 features (if applicable)
• I've tested my code snippets in a ServiceNow environment (where possible)

Repository Structure Compliance

• I've placed my code snippet(s) in one of the required top-level categories:
  • Core ServiceNow APIs/
  • Server-Side Components/
  • Client-Side Components/
  • Modern Development/
  • Integration/
  • Specialized Areas/
• I've used appropriate sub-categories within the top-level categories
• Each code snippet has its own folder with a descriptive name

Documentation

• I've included a README.md file for each code snippet
• The README.md includes:
  • Description of the code snippet functionality
  • Usage instructions or examples
  • Any prerequisites or dependencies
  • (Optional) Screenshots or diagrams if helpful

Restrictions

• My PR does not include XML exports of ServiceNow records
• My PR does not contain sensitive information (passwords, API keys, tokens)
• My PR does not include changes that fall outside the described scope

[ravichandra1998g]

Thank you for your submission. However, it appears that this pull request is incomplete. It lacks A README.md file that describes the code snippet. Please complete your contribution by adding the necessary elements and resubmit or update this pull request for further review. Closing this for now. Once you make additional changes, feel free to re-open this Pull Request or create a new one.

[michael-albinson-sn]

Hey @ravichandra1998g there's a readme for this snippet already here - is the intent that I create another one? Even for minor fixes like this?

[wiz0floyd]

Looks good. We've cleared up the readme concerns with the reviewer team.