Application CI Count – Non-Operational & Installed

[Rampriya-S]

PR Description:

Pull Request Checklist

Overview

• [x ] I have read and understood the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines
• [ x] My pull request has a descriptive title that accurately reflects the changes
• [ x] I've included only files relevant to the changes described in the PR title and description
• [ x] I've created a new branch in my forked repository for this contribution

Code Quality

• [x ] My code is relevant to ServiceNow developers
• [ x] My code snippets expand meaningfully on official ServiceNow documentation (if applicable)
• [x ] I've disclosed use of ES2021 features (if applicable)
• [ x] I've tested my code snippets in a ServiceNow environment (where possible)

Repository Structure Compliance

• [ x] I've placed my code snippet(s) in one of the required top-level categories:
  • Core ServiceNow APIs/
  • Server-Side Components/
  • Client-Side Components/
  • Modern Development/
  • Integration/
  • Specialized Areas/
• [ x] I've used appropriate sub-categories within the top-level categories
• [ x] Each code snippet has its own folder with a descriptive name

Documentation

• [ x] I've included a README.md file for each code snippet
• [ x] The README.md includes:
  • Description of the code snippet functionality
  • Usage instructions or examples
  • Any prerequisites or dependencies
  • (Optional) Screenshots or diagrams if helpful

Restrictions

• [x ] My PR does not include XML exports of ServiceNow records
• [x ] My PR does not contain sensitive information (passwords, API keys, tokens)
• [ x] My PR does not include changes that fall outside the described scope

[WillemZeiler]

Thank you for your contribution. This CMDB health check script is a cool idea! However, it doesn’t comply with our contributing guidelines. As a reminder, the general requirements (as outlined in the CONTRIBUTING.md file) are the following: follow the folder+subfolder+snippetfolder guidelines and include a readme.md file explaining what the code snippet does.

Folder is in the right place, but naming of the sub-folder should match guidelines. In addition, see if you can give the script a descriptive name (instead of script.js).

Review your contribution against the guidelines and make the necessary adjustments. Closing this for now. Once you make additional changes, feel free to re-open this Pull Request or create a new one.

(It would be helpful to others, if perhaps you can include a bit more info on why you are running this check and why it could help improve the CMDB quality. You could tell a bit more why non-operational applications that have a installed status would degrade the CMDB. In addition, would similar checks be applicable to other CI's/types?)

[Rampriya-S]

Absolutely, I will adjust it.