Replace unused variable in lambda expression

[b2m]

User description

Description

In Python it is common to indicate unused variables by choosing _ (underscore) as variable name. This pull request replaces some instances of unused variables in lambda expressions to align with Python customs and also other test examples in the repository.

Types of changes

• Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
• Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
• Improved translation
• Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing document.
• I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

---

PR Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Replaced unused variables in lambda expressions with _ for Python convention.

• Improved code readability and consistency with Python customs.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	test_waits.py Update lambda expressions to use `_` for unused variables examples/python/tests/waits/test_waits.py Replaced d with _ in lambda expressions to indicate unused variables. Updated two test cases (test_explicit and test_explicit_options) for better readability. +2/-2

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for selenium-dev ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	354c9a0
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/selenium-dev/deploys/67a20d77e4901f0008b37aa9
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2160--selenium-dev.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[qodo-code-review]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ No major issues detected

[qodo-code-review]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
General	Avoid side effects in wait conditions The lambda expression in test_explicit_options uses a side effect (send_keys) within the wait condition, which is an anti-pattern. Move the send_keys operation after the wait condition. examples/python/tests/waits/test_waits.py [55] -wait.until(lambda _ : revealed.send_keys("Displayed") or True) +wait.until(lambda _ : revealed.is_displayed()) +revealed.send_keys("Displayed") Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Having side effects (send_keys) in a wait condition is a poor practice that can lead to race conditions and flaky tests. Moving the send_keys operation after waiting for visibility makes the test more reliable and follows better testing patterns.	9

[b2m]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:
Category Suggestion Score
General
Avoid side effects in wait conditions

9

As the example is explicitly on how side effects can be achieved the suggestion is imho a false positive.

[harsha509]

Thank you @b2m !

[harsha509]

Congratulations on your first contribution to Selenium-docs @b2m 🎉 🎉

[b2m]

Congratulations on your first contribution to Selenium-docs @b2m 🎉 🎉

Great experience, feels like I should repeat it sometime 😉. Thank you @harsha509.