[LQP Meta] Parser and pretty printer benchmarks#218
Open
Conversation
comnik
reviewed
Feb 25, 2026
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| # Old (Lark-based) | ||
| uv run --no-project --with "lqp==0.2.3" python meta/bench/benchmark.py |
comnik
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2026
Collaborator
comnik
left a comment
comnik
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice, thank you!! Good to see that we're in the same ballpark. I saw you had some tweaks out for the pretty printer already.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add benchmarks comparing the old Lark/IR-based parser and pretty-printer with the new generated ones.
Results at 20 iterations: