[docs]:Add standardized function comment blocks for mutex test cases

[ruanqiuqiu]

拉取/合并请求描述：(PR description)

[

为什么提交这份PR (why to submit this PR)

Relates to #10895

你的解决方案是什么 (what is your solution)

请提供验证的bsp和config (provide the config and bsp)

• BSP:

• .config:

• action:

]

当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR

必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):

• 本拉取/合并请求是一个草稿版本 This PR is for a code-review and is intended to get feedback
• 本拉取/合并请求是一个成熟版本 This PR is mature, and ready to be integrated into the repo

代码质量 Code Quality：

我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:

• 已经仔细查看过代码改动的对比 Already check the difference between PR and old code
• 代码风格正确，包括缩进空格，命名及其他风格 Style guide is adhered to, including spacing, naming and other styles
• 没有垃圾代码，代码尽量精简，不包含#if 0代码，不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up
• 所有变更均有原因及合理的，并且不会影响到其他软件组件代码或BSP All modifications are justified and not affect other components or BSP
• 对难懂代码均提供对应的注释 I've commented appropriately where code is tricky
• 代码是高质量的 Code in this PR is of high quality
• 已经使用formatting 等源码格式化工具确保格式符合RT-Thread代码规范 This PR complies with RT-Thread code specification
• 如果是新增bsp, 已经添加ci检查到.github/ALL_BSP_COMPILE.json 详细请参考链接BSP自查

[github-actions]

👋 感谢您对 RT-Thread 的贡献！Thank you for your contribution to RT-Thread!

为确保代码符合 RT-Thread 的编码规范，请在你的仓库中执行以下步骤运行代码格式化工作流（如果格式化CI运行失败）。
To ensure your code complies with RT-Thread's coding style, please run the code formatting workflow by following the steps below (If the formatting of CI fails to run).

---

🛠 操作步骤 | Steps

1. 前往 Actions 页面 | Go to the Actions page
   点击进入工作流 → | Click to open workflow →

2. 点击 Run workflow | Click Run workflow

• 设置需排除的文件/目录（目录请以"/"结尾）
  Set files/directories to exclude (directories should end with "/")
• 将目标分支设置为 \ Set the target branch to：add-mutex-comment-block
• 设置PR number为 \ Set the PR number to：10957

3. 等待工作流完成 | Wait for the workflow to complete
   格式化后的代码将自动推送至你的分支。
   The formatted code will be automatically pushed to your branch.

完成后，提交将自动更新至 add-mutex-comment-block 分支，关联的 Pull Request 也会同步更新。
Once completed, commits will be pushed to the add-mutex-comment-block branch automatically, and the related Pull Request will be updated.

如有问题欢迎联系我们，再次感谢您的贡献！💐
If you have any questions, feel free to reach out. Thanks again for your contribution!

[github-actions]

📌 Code Review Assignment

🏷️ Tag: kernel

Reviewers: GorrayLi ReviewSun hamburger-os lianux-mm wdfk-prog xu18838022837

Changed Files (Click to expand)

• src/utest/mutex_pi_tc.c
• src/utest/mutex_tc.c

---

📊 Current Review Status (Last Updated: 2025-11-20 16:39 CST)

• ⌛ GorrayLi Pending Review
• ✅ ReviewSun Reviewed On 2025-11-18 20:46 CST
• ⌛ hamburger-os Pending Review
• ⌛ lianux-mm Pending Review
• ⌛ wdfk-prog Pending Review
• ⌛ xu18838022837 Pending Review

---

📝 Review Instructions

1. 维护者可以通过单击此处来刷新审查状态: 🔄 刷新状态
   Maintainers can refresh the review status by clicking here: 🔄 Refresh Status

2. 确认审核通过后评论 LGTM/lgtm
   Comment LGTM/lgtm after confirming approval

3. PR合并前需至少一位维护者确认
   PR must be confirmed by at least one maintainer before merging

ℹ️ 刷新CI状态操作需要具备仓库写入权限。
ℹ️ Refresh CI status operation requires repository Write permission.

[ReviewSun]

LGTM

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds comprehensive documentation blocks to two mutex-related unit test files in RT-Thread, improving code maintainability and test case clarity. The standardized documentation follows a consistent format including test objectives, scenarios, verification metrics, dependencies, and expected results.

Key Changes

• Added detailed test documentation header to mutex_tc.c describing mutex functional and scheduling validation
• Added detailed test documentation header to mutex_pi_tc.c describing mutex priority inheritance and timeout behavior tests

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File	Description
src/utest/mutex_tc.c	Added comprehensive documentation block (lines 12-45) describing mutex functional tests including static/dynamic operations, priority inheritance, recursive locking, and timeout handling
src/utest/mutex_pi_tc.c	Added comprehensive documentation block (lines 10-43) describing mutex priority inheritance tests including multi-level PI updates, timeout behavior, and recursive dependency chains

[Copilot]

Trailing whitespace in comment block / 注释块末尾有多余空格

English: There is an extra space after the closing comment marker */ on this line. This should be removed for consistency with standard comment formatting.

中文：此行的注释结束标记 */ 后有一个多余的空格。应删除此空格以保持标准注释格式的一致性。

Suggested change

	*/
	*/

[Copilot]

PR Title Specificity Issue / PR 标题具体性问题

English: The PR title mentions "mutex_tc" but this PR modifies two files: mutex_tc.c and mutex_pi_tc.c. The title should accurately reflect all modified files. Consider revising to:
[docs] Add standardized function comment blocks for mutex test cases

中文：PR 标题提到 "mutex_tc"，但此 PR 修改了两个文件：mutex_tc.c 和 mutex_pi_tc.c。标题应准确反映所有修改的文件。建议修改为：
[docs] Add standardized function comment blocks for mutex test cases

Note: While the prefix format [docs] is correct, the description should cover both files being modified.

注意：虽然前缀格式 [docs] 是正确的，但描述应涵盖正在修改的两个文件。

[Copilot]

PR Description Incomplete / PR 描述不完整

English: The PR description references issue #10895 but does not explain:

1. What changes were made (adding standardized documentation blocks to two test files)
2. Why these changes are needed (improving test documentation consistency)
3. List of modified files (src/utest/mutex_tc.c and src/utest/mutex_pi_tc.c)

Please update the PR description to include these details as per RT-Thread contribution guidelines.

中文：PR 描述引用了 issue #10895，但未说明：

1. 做了什么修改（为两个测试文件添加标准化文档块）
2. 为什么需要这些修改（提高测试文档的一致性）
3. 修改文件列表（src/utest/mutex_tc.c 和 src/utest/mutex_pi_tc.c）

请根据 RT-Thread 贡献指南更新 PR 描述以包含这些详细信息。

[Rbb666]

存在CI报错，结尾缺少换行，顺便也添加下吧，谢谢