[utest][mailbox]: add standardized documentation for mailbox test#10939
[utest][mailbox]: add standardized documentation for mailbox test#10939Rbb666 merged 1 commit intoRT-Thread:masterfrom
Conversation
|
👋 感谢您对 RT-Thread 的贡献!Thank you for your contribution to RT-Thread! 为确保代码符合 RT-Thread 的编码规范,请在你的仓库中执行以下步骤运行代码格式化工作流(如果格式化CI运行失败)。 🛠 操作步骤 | Steps
完成后,提交将自动更新至 如有问题欢迎联系我们,再次感谢您的贡献!💐 |
📌 Code Review Assignment🏷️ Tag: kernelReviewers: GorrayLi ReviewSun hamburger-os lianux-mm wdfk-prog xu18838022837 Changed Files (Click to expand)
📊 Current Review Status (Last Updated: 2025-11-21 17:38 CST)
📝 Review Instructions
|
|
@Rbb666 老师,自动检查通过了,麻烦您审核一下 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds comprehensive standardized documentation for the RT-Thread mailbox unit test. The documentation follows a structured format to describe test objectives, scenarios, verification metrics, dependencies, and expected results.
Key Changes
- Added detailed test case documentation block with test objectives, scenarios, and verification metrics
- Documented mailbox API coverage and testing approach
- Specified hardware/software dependencies and expected test results
| * Date Author Notes | ||
| * 2021-09-08 liukang the first version | ||
| * 2023-09-15 xqyjlj change stack size in cpu64 | ||
| * 2025-11-16 ChuanN-sudo add standardized utest documentation block |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 PR Title Format Issue / PR 标题格式问题
English: PR title should follow the format: [module][subsystem] Description using lowercase brackets, not parentheses.
Current title: docs(utest):Add standardized documentation for Mailbox Test
Suggested title: [utest][mailbox] add standardized documentation for mailbox test
中文: PR 标题应遵循格式:使用小写方括号的 [模块][子系统] 描述,而不是圆括号。
当前标题: docs(utest):Add standardized documentation for Mailbox Test
建议标题: [utest][mailbox] add standardized documentation for mailbox test
src/utest/mailbox_tc.c
Outdated
| * Test Case Name: IPC Mailbox Test | ||
| * | ||
| * Test Objectives: | ||
| * - Validate mailbox core functionality under different scheduling policies amd allocation methods. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Spelling Error / 拼写错误
English: There is a typo in "amd" which should be "and".
Current: different scheduling policies amd allocation methods
Corrected: different scheduling policies and allocation methods
中文: "amd" 应为 "and"。
当前: different scheduling policies amd allocation methods
更正: different scheduling policies and allocation methods
| * - Validate mailbox core functionality under different scheduling policies amd allocation methods. | |
| * - Validate mailbox core functionality under different scheduling policies and allocation methods. |
src/utest/mailbox_tc.c
Outdated
| * - All mailbox initialization and creation operations return RT_EOK status. | ||
| * - Mailbox detachment and deletion operations complete successfully without resource leaks. | ||
| * - Sent messages are correctly received with preserved content integrity. | ||
| * - Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values.. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Spelling/Formatting Error / 拼写/格式错误
English: There is an extra period at the end of the line creating a double period.
Current: Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values..
Corrected: Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values.
中文: 行尾有多余的句点,形成了双句点。
当前: Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values..
更正: Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values.
| * - Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values.. | |
| * - Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values. |
Signed-off-by: ChuanN-sudo <fjchuanil@gmail.com>
e350c66 to
3893385
Compare
拉取/合并请求描述:(PR description)
Relates to #10895
为什么提交这份PR (why to submit this PR)
Add standardized documentation for Mailbox Test
你的解决方案是什么 (what is your solution)
请提供验证的bsp和config (provide the config and bsp)
BSP:
.config:
action:
]
当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR
必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):
代码质量 Code Quality:
我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:
#if 0代码,不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up