[docs][utest]:Add standardized utest documentation block for object_tc#10931
[docs][utest]:Add standardized utest documentation block for object_tc#10931Rbb666 merged 1 commit intoRT-Thread:masterfrom
Conversation
|
👋 感谢您对 RT-Thread 的贡献！Thank you for your contribution to RT-Thread! 为确保代码符合 RT-Thread 的编码规范，请在你的仓库中执行以下步骤运行代码格式化工作流（如果格式化CI运行失败）。 🛠 操作步骤 | Steps
完成后，提交将自动更新至 如有问题欢迎联系我们，再次感谢您的贡献！💐 |
📌 Code Review Assignment🏷️ Tag: kernelReviewers: GorrayLi ReviewSun hamburger-os lianux-mm wdfk-prog xu18838022837 Changed Files (Click to expand)
📊 Current Review Status (Last Updated: 2025-11-13 16:45 CST)
📝 Review Instructions
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds comprehensive documentation to the object_tc.c unit test file in RT-Thread's test suite. The documentation follows a standardized format to describe test objectives, scenarios, verification metrics, dependencies, and expected results for the kernel object management test suite.
Key Changes:
- Added a changelog entry documenting the documentation addition
- Inserted a detailed 48-line documentation block describing the test case structure, scenarios, and expected behaviors
src/utest/object_tc.c
Outdated
| * 5. Validate negative paths for nonexistent and NULL names across object, thread, and device lookup helpers. | ||
| * - **Scenario 3 (Info Enumeration / test_object_info_enumeration):** | ||
| * 1. Mix static and dynamic thread objects and query rt_object_get_information for metadata. | ||
| * 2. Retrieve counts with rt_object_get_length and enumerate pointers with headroom buffers. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Spelling Error / 拼写错误
English: The word "headroom" should be "additional" or "extra" in this context. "Headroom buffers" is not a standard technical term. The phrase should be "enumerate pointers with additional buffer space" or "enumerate pointers with sufficient buffer size".
中文："headroom buffers"不是标准技术术语。应该改为"additional buffer space"（额外的缓冲空间）或"sufficient buffer size"（足够的缓冲区大小）。
Suggested correction:
* - **Scenario 3 (Info Enumeration / test_object_info_enumeration):**
* 1. Mix static and dynamic thread objects and query rt_object_get_information for metadata.
* 2. Retrieve counts with rt_object_get_length and enumerate pointers with sufficient buffer space.| * 2. Retrieve counts with rt_object_get_length and enumerate pointers with headroom buffers. | |
| * 2. Retrieve counts with rt_object_get_length and enumerate pointers with sufficient buffer space. |
src/utest/object_tc.c
Outdated
| * | ||
| * Verification Metrics: | ||
| * - **Scenario 1:** Name strings must be null-terminated within TEST_RT_NAME_MAX, retain expected contents, and reflect correct system-object classification. | ||
| * - **Scenario 2:** Lookup helpers return valid handles for registered objects, maintain distinct results for same-prefix devices, and return NULL for missing or invalid names; device deregistration must succeed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nitpick] Documentation Clarity Issue / 文档清晰度问题
English: The phrase "maintain distinct results for same-prefix devices" is unclear. It should be "correctly distinguish between devices with similar name prefixes" or "return distinct handles for devices with the same name prefix".
中文："maintain distinct results for same-prefix devices"（对同前缀设备保持不同的结果）表述不够清晰。应该改为"correctly distinguish between devices with similar name prefixes"（正确区分具有相似名称前缀的设备）或"return distinct handles for devices with the same name prefix"（为具有相同名称前缀的设备返回不同的句柄）。
Suggested correction:
* - **Scenario 2:** Lookup helpers return valid handles for registered objects, correctly distinguish between devices with similar name prefixes, and return NULL for missing or invalid names; device deregistration must succeed.| * - **Scenario 2:** Lookup helpers return valid handles for registered objects, maintain distinct results for same-prefix devices, and return NULL for missing or invalid names; device deregistration must succeed. | |
| * - **Scenario 2:** Lookup helpers return valid handles for registered objects, correctly distinguish between devices with similar name prefixes, and return NULL for missing or invalid names; device deregistration must succeed. |
src/utest/object_tc.c
Outdated
| * Test Scenarios: | ||
| * - **Scenario 1 (Name Handling / test_object_name_handling):** | ||
| * 1. Create static objects with maximum-length names to validate truncation and null-termination rules. | ||
| * 2. Allocate dynamic objects with maximum-length names to confirm user-space naming and non-system classification. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nitpick] Documentation Inconsistency / 文档不一致
English: The documentation mentions "user-space naming" in line 25, but RT-Thread is primarily an RTOS for embedded systems and the concept of "user-space" may not apply in all configurations. Consider using "dynamic object naming" or "heap-allocated object naming" instead for clarity.
中文：文档第 25 行提到"user-space naming"（用户空间命名），但 RT-Thread 主要是用于嵌入式系统的 RTOS，在所有配置中"用户空间"的概念可能并不适用。建议使用"dynamic object naming"（动态对象命名）或"heap-allocated object naming"（堆分配对象命名）以提高清晰度。
Suggested correction:
* 2. Allocate dynamic objects with maximum-length names to confirm dynamic object naming and non-system classification.| * 2. Allocate dynamic objects with maximum-length names to confirm user-space naming and non-system classification. | |
| * 2. Allocate dynamic objects with maximum-length names to confirm dynamic object naming and non-system classification. |
src/utest/object_tc.c
Outdated
| * 1. Register static thread objects and verify discovery via rt_object_find. | ||
| * 2. Create runtime threads and confirm rt_thread_find returns expected handles. | ||
| * 3. (Optional with RT_USING_DEVICE) Register temporary devices, test rt_device_find against multiple entries, and validate deregistration paths. | ||
| * 4. Exercise same-prefix device registrations to confirm distinct name resolution. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nitpick] Grammar Issue / 语法问题
English: In line 32, "Exercise same-prefix device registrations" should be "Test same-prefix device registrations" or "Verify same-prefix device registrations" for better clarity and consistency with other test descriptions.
中文：在第 32 行，"Exercise same-prefix device registrations"（执行同前缀设备注册）应改为"Test same-prefix device registrations"（测试同前缀设备注册）或"Verify same-prefix device registrations"（验证同前缀设备注册），以便与其他测试描述保持一致性和清晰度。
Suggested correction:
* 4. Test same-prefix device registrations to confirm distinct name resolution.| * 4. Exercise same-prefix device registrations to confirm distinct name resolution. | |
| * 4. Test same-prefix device registrations to confirm distinct name resolution. |
src/utest/object_tc.c
Outdated
| * Change Logs: | ||
| * Date Author Notes | ||
| * 2025-07-18 kurisaW First commit | ||
| * 2025-11-13 CYFS Add standardized utest documentation block |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Title Naming Guideline Issue / PR 标题命名规范问题
English: The PR title does not follow RT-Thread's naming conventions. It should specify the module or subsystem in the format [module][subsystem] description.
Recommended format:
[utest][object] Add standardized documentation block for object_tc
or
[core][object] Add utest documentation block for object_tc
中文：PR 标题不符合 RT-Thread 的命名规范。标题需要明确指出涉及的具体模块或子系统，使用 [模块][子系统] 描述 的格式。
推荐格式：
[utest][object] Add standardized documentation block for object_tc
或
[core][object] Add utest documentation block for object_tc
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In progress
to Done
in 单元测试（UTEST）Framework
2 participants
Relates to #10895
拉取/合并请求描述：(PR description)
[
为什么提交这份PR (why to submit this PR)
你的解决方案是什么 (what is your solution)
请提供验证的bsp和config (provide the config and bsp)
]
当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR
必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):
代码质量 Code Quality：
我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:
#if 0代码，不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up