Skip to content

Conversation

@leburgel
Copy link
Member

@leburgel leburgel commented Nov 5, 2025

Since it's become apparent that our current implementations are likely incorrect for PEPS and PEPOs with dual physical spaces for symmetries with non-trivial braiding (see the discussions in #274 and #283), this explicitly disallows these configurations in the respective constructors until we've solved the underlying issues.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/operators/infinitepepo.jl 71.42% <100.00%> (+0.59%) ⬆️
src/states/infinitepeps.jl 65.83% <100.00%> (+0.57%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Yue-Zhengyuan Yue-Zhengyuan enabled auto-merge (squash) November 6, 2025 01:55
@Yue-Zhengyuan Yue-Zhengyuan merged commit 6c4e3f0 into master Nov 6, 2025
51 checks passed
@Yue-Zhengyuan Yue-Zhengyuan deleted the lb/forbid_dual_physical branch November 6, 2025 04:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants