-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Rename isisometry to isisometric for consistency with project_isometric
#73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Co-authored-by: lkdvos <37111893+lkdvos@users.noreply.github.com>
isisometry to isisometric for consistency with project_isometric
lkdvos
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@copilot can you also make sure to update is_left_isometry and is_right_isometry accordingly?
…isrightisometric Co-authored-by: lkdvos <37111893+lkdvos@users.noreply.github.com>
Done! Renamed Warning Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:
If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:
|
|
@Jutho and @mtfishman , any opinions on |
|
I'd vote for |
|
I do think But I also don't mind too much, so without underscores is also fine. (Personally, for linear maps, I actually think only |
|
I don't think I care too much at all, so as an alternative that doesn't need a choice: how do you feel about just removing that layer altogether, and only keeping |
|
What about |
|
Ok, in the interest of making a decision, and given that I don't think any of this really has any substantial impact, I'll just keep to what was previously there, and go with |
lkdvos
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For me this is good to go once the tests pass. Unless anyone objects, I'll merge this tomorrow.
ba27be0 to
1bc4b9d
Compare
1bc4b9d to
1e36ef1
Compare
* Bump v0.6 * rename `gaugefix` -> `fixgauge` * reduce unnecessary warnings * fix `copy_input` signatures in Mooncake tests * Add changelog to docs
This PR renames the
isisometryfunction toisisometricthroughout the codebase to improve naming consistency with the relatedproject_isometricfunction. Additionally, the internal helper functionsis_left_isometryandis_right_isometryhave been renamed toisleftisometricandisrightisometricrespectively.Changes
The following updates were made across 13 files:
isisometrytoisisometricinsrc/common/matrixproperties.jlis_left_isometrytoisleftisometricandis_right_isometrytoisrightisometricinsrc/common/matrixproperties.jlsrc/MatrixAlgebraKit.jlisunitary,isleftisometric,isrightisometric)isisometricas non-differentiableMotivation
The function
project_isometricuses the adjective form "isometric" rather than the noun form "isometry". For consistency and readability, all related functions now follow the same naming convention.Testing
All existing tests pass with the renamed functions:
Fixes #69
Original prompt
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.