Skip to content

Update methanol steam reforming investment costs#272

Open
AlexanderMeisinger wants to merge 3 commits intoPyPSA:masterfrom
AlexanderMeisinger:methanol-steam-reforming
Open

Update methanol steam reforming investment costs#272
AlexanderMeisinger wants to merge 3 commits intoPyPSA:masterfrom
AlexanderMeisinger:methanol-steam-reforming

Conversation

@AlexanderMeisinger
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes # (if applicable).

Changes proposed in this Pull Request

The investment cost currently assumed for methanol steam reforming appears unrealistically low at 18016 EUR/MW H2. Carels et al. (2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.06.128) report investment costs of 4000 €2024/(kg H2/h) for methanol steam reforming in the supplementary material, Table 7, based on several literature sources. Using the hydrogen LHV of 33.33 kWh/kg, this corresponds to approximately 120012 €2024/MW H2. Although this value refers to 2035, it appears considerably more realistic than the current assumption.

Checklist

  • Code changes are sufficiently documented; i.e. new functions contain docstrings and further explanations may be given in doc.
  • Data source for new technologies is clearly stated.
  • Newly introduced dependencies are added to environment.yaml (if applicable).
  • A note for the release notes doc/release_notes.rst of the upcoming release is included.
  • I consent to the release of this PR's code under the GPLv3 license.

@AlexanderMeisinger
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

This will solve issue #271.

@AlexanderMeisinger AlexanderMeisinger marked this pull request as draft April 30, 2026 13:40
@AlexanderMeisinger AlexanderMeisinger marked this pull request as ready for review April 30, 2026 13:40
@euronion euronion self-requested a review May 5, 2026 09:59
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@euronion euronion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the sugestion.

The current base value is actually higher (5 000 EUR/kg H2 /h) than your suggested value (4 000 EUR/kg H2h), with the difference being the facility capacity.
The current value is calculated for a large facility (200 MW) with a scaling factor of 0.6, whilst you do not scale your value.

I would say these are different legitimate cases and could warrant separate entries, e.g.:

  • Methanol steam reforming 200 MW : Renaming of the existing entry
  • Methanol steam reforming 1 MW: Either your entry or based on the current entry without the scaling applied, i.e. 5 kEUR/kg H2/h2

What do you think about this approach?

In addition, if we adopt the source that you suggest, could you make sure to adjust the other techno-economic assumptions to be in line with the new source as well?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants