Skip to content

Conversation

@carlos-marchal-ph
Copy link
Contributor

@carlos-marchal-ph carlos-marchal-ph commented Dec 19, 2025

We should add screenshots later but it's non-trivial to get them looking nice so it's worth shipping this as is for the moment.

Old description for draft

This is a draft because of two main reasons.

First is I couldn't manage to get this to work locally, encountered a couple of errors and at the end got stuck here when running pnpm start:

Stuck
warn undefined
chunk commons [mini-css-extract-plugin]
Conflicting order. Following module has been added:
 * css
./node_modules/.pnpm/css-loader@5.2.7_webpack@5.101.3/node_modules/css-loader/di
st/cjs.js??ruleSet[1].rules[8].oneOf[1].use[1]!./node_modules/.pnpm/postcss-load
er@4.3.0_postcss@8.5.6_webpack@5.101.3/node_modules/postcss-loader/dist/cjs.js??
ruleSet[1].rules[8].oneOf[1].use[2]!./src/components/RadixUI/css/toast.css
despite it was not able to fulfill desired ordering with these modules:
 * css ./node_modules/.pnpm/css-loader@5.2.7_webpack@5.101.3/node_modules/css-lo
ader/dist/cjs.js??ruleSet[1].rules[8].oneOf[1].use[1]!./node_modules/.pnpm/postc
ss-loader@4.3.0_postcss@8.5.6_webpack@5.101.3/node_modules/postcss-loader/dist/c
js.js??ruleSet[1].rules[8].oneOf[1].use[2]!./src/styles/global.css
   - couldn't fulfill desired order of chunk group(s)
component---src-templates-api-endpoint-tsx,
component---src-templates-api-endpoint-tsxhead
   - while fulfilling desired order of chunk group(s) commons,
component---src-pages-careers-tsx, component---src-pages-contributors-tsx,
component---src-pages-merch-tsx, component---src-pages-careers-tsxhead,
component---src-pages-contributors-tsxhead
success Building development bundle - 84.069s
success Writing page-data.json files to public directory - 0.436s - 2/9224
21146.34/s

Second is that our data for the screenshots looks quite wonky, since the naming scheme for evals is all over the place, a lot of them are missing descriptions, and many of them don't follow the convention true = pass, false = fail. Shouldn't be too hard to fix, but would take a bit of time.

@carlos-marchal-ph carlos-marchal-ph self-assigned this Dec 19, 2025
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 19, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
posthog Ready Ready Preview Jan 2, 2026 11:23am

@carlos-marchal-ph carlos-marchal-ph force-pushed the feat(llma)/add-evals-docs branch from 9fe9031 to a60cc26 Compare January 2, 2026 10:59
@carlos-marchal-ph carlos-marchal-ph requested a review from a team January 2, 2026 11:00
@carlos-marchal-ph carlos-marchal-ph marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2026 11:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants