Skip to content

Conversation

@mauroservienti
Copy link
Member

@mauroservienti mauroservienti commented Jan 22, 2026

The recently introduced license status check doesn't account for connecting to secured RavenDB servers, such as RavenDB cloud.

This PR changes the way the license status check connects to the RavenDB server. Using the internal RavenDB HTTP Client, the call uses all the preconfigured connection settings, including any authentication configuration. Tested against RavenDB Cloud with certificate authentication.

@mauroservienti mauroservienti added this to the 6.9.1 milestone Jan 22, 2026
@mauroservienti mauroservienti changed the title Use the internal RavenDB HTTP client to perform the license status check The license status check fails when checking license against a secured RavenDB instance Jan 22, 2026
@mauroservienti mauroservienti merged commit 3ddbf83 into master Jan 22, 2026
32 checks passed
@mauroservienti mauroservienti deleted the use-internal-raven-client-to-check-for-license branch January 22, 2026 20:23
mauroservienti added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2026
…d RavenDB instance (#5274)

* Use the internal RavenDB HTTP client

* extract the server URL from the document store

* Refactor license status check with cancellation token

* Fix whitespace

* Make the primary instance LicenseStatusCheck behave like the audit instance one

---------

Co-authored-by: Ramon Smits <ramon.smits@gmail.com>
mauroservienti added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2026
@mauroservienti mauroservienti changed the title The license status check fails when checking license against a secured RavenDB instance The license status check fails when checking the license against a secured RavenDB instance Jan 23, 2026
@mauroservienti
Copy link
Member Author

Backported to 6.9 in #5277

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants