Conversation
Signed-off-by: Habedank Clemens <qxs2704@europe.bmw.corp>
clemenshabedank
changed the title
Signed-off-by: Habedank Clemens <qxs2704@europe.bmw.corp>
| <DefaultExperiment startTime="0.0" stepSize="0.020"/> | ||
| <VendorAnnotations> | ||
| <Tool name="net.pmsf.osmp" xmlns:osmp="http://xsd.pmsf.net/OSISensorModelPackaging"><osmp:osmp version="1.2.0" osi-version="3.4.0"/></Tool> | ||
| <Tool name="net.pmsf.osmp" xmlns:osmp="http://xsd.pmsf.net/OSISimulationModelPackaging"><osmp:osmp version="1.2.0" osi-version="3.4.0"/></Tool> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@pmai please have a look if the changes in the VendorAnnotations for the example fmus are fine for you (just a result of replace all...).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
None of this can be done in a minor release, since it completely changes the syntax of the standard (different namespace). If we are going to do this, the namespace should be changed to an ASAM-owned domain along the way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
But it is not wrong :)
@engelben would we have a suitable domain at ASAM reserved for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would vote for a change, as well.
However, things brings me to the more general question of changing OSI to OpenInterface or similar
- to be consistent in ASAM with OpenScenario, OpenDrive, OpenODD, etc.
- to be clearly distinguished from the OSI model, which was the first acronym out there and is confusing conversations all the time..
Signed-off-by: Habedank Clemens <qxs2704@europe.bmw.corp>
clemenshabedank
added
the
ReadyForCCBReview
clemenshabedank
changed the title
|
CCB output 09.05.2022:
|
kmeids
removed
the
ReadyForCCBReview
5 participants
Signed-off-by: Habedank Clemens qxs2704@europe.bmw.corp
For more details see #67