Logical lanes: add road type#707
Conversation
|
Harmonization WG 2023/03/01: Won't adapt any changes from OpenDrive if there are still changes going on in OpenDrive (see 'Overlapping bike lane with lanes' topic). |
|
Is there anything I can do to help this topic be merged? I need this data for simulation of traffic agents. |
|
OSI CCB 2025.10.30: @tbleher Could you check that the definitions here still match current OpenDRIVE? |
Sure 😃 I checked with OpenDRIVE 1.8.1 (the currently released OpenDRIVE version), and the enum matches OpenDRIVE exactly (except that OSI has a I'm part of the OpenDRIVE CCB, and so far we have not received requests to add new road types or modify existing types. I do not also see any active Pull Request adding or changing the roadType. |
|
@asadekasam and @pmai Could this commit be merged? Any input from the CCB on what is still missing from this PR? |
I will add it to this week's CCB then (Thursday 2025.11.27) |
The road type is useful since traffic participant models might want to influence their behavior based on the type of road that they are driving on, or make decisions in terms of navigation based on that information. It is also helpful to display a road in a navigation system, as typically different road types are displayed differently. Signed-off-by: Daniel Mata <Daniel.Mata@partner.bmw.de>
Signed-off-by: Pierre R. Mai <pmai@pmsf.de>
pmai
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved by CCB on 2025-11-27 after fixes.
Add a description
LogicalLane message was extended to support road type information from OpenDRIVE.
Some questions to ask:
What is this change?
What does it fix?
Take this checklist as orientation for yourself, if this PR is ready for the Change Control Board: