Skip to content

Conversation

@SKopecz
Copy link
Collaborator

@SKopecz SKopecz commented Dec 23, 2025

This implements #107.

  • Out-of-place implementation of the 2nd order MPLM22 scheme.
  • In-place implementation of the 2nd order MPLM22 scheme.
  • All other implementations
  • Tests
  • Docs
  • Additional test problems

@SKopecz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

SKopecz commented Dec 23, 2025

All the onestep MPRK/SSPMPRK and also the multistep Patankar schemes can be interpreted as sequences of MPE steps with slightly modified input data. Before continuing this PR we should implement a function like _permform_step_MPE! and rewrite the implementations of MPRK and SSPMPRK schemes. This will make the implementation of the multistep Patankar schemes easier and cleaner.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 73 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/mplm.jl 0.00% 73 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 20463325235

Details

  • 0 of 73 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-3.3%) to 94.514%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
src/mplm.jl 0 73 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 20199034964: -3.3%
Covered Lines: 2050
Relevant Lines: 2169

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants