feat(rpcv10): response_flags for the rpcv10; proof_facts, proof for invoke v3 txs

[MaksymMalicki]

This PR introduces support for new optional fields for transactions:

• proof_facts for invoke v3 transactions
• proof and proof_facts for broadcasted invoke v3 transactions, which are passed to the gateway write API

The invoke v3 transactions will contain proof_facts optional field, when the INCLUDE_PROOF_FACTS flag is included in the response_flags new parameter in starknet_getBlockWithTxs, starknet_getBlockWithReceipts, starknet_getTransactionByHash, starknet_getTransactionByBlockIdAndIndex. If the flag is not present, the transactions are processed in the same way as in previous versions of the RPC.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 67.37160% with 108 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 75.39%. Comparing base (5ce32d2) to head (66575f7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
rpc/v10/transaction.go	59.36%	73 Missing and 16 partials ⚠️
rpc/v10/estimate_fee.go	0.00%	13 Missing ⚠️
rpc/v9/transaction.go	88.88%	4 Missing ⚠️
rpc/v10/response_flags.go	83.33%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3380      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.44%   75.39%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         378      379       +1     
  Lines       35284    35555     +271     
==========================================
+ Hits        26619    26807     +188     
- Misses       6806     6869      +63     
- Partials     1859     1879      +20     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[EgeCaner]

First round of review

[thiagodeev]

Hey. Overall, good job!

I've found two bugs while reviewing.
This is only a partial review. I still need to finish reviewing the test files, but I thought it would be good to submit this review right now, so that you can fix them while I finish.

These bugs show us that we need to improve the new tests, since they passed without catching them

[thiagodeev]

I've finished my review. LGTM.
I'm ready to approve after you apply the fix for the two bugs I mentioned in the previous review