chore(spec): auto-polish waterfall-basic#5738
Open
claude[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
Conversation
Standardize 'sequential' to 'stepwise' in features tags (per spec-tags-generator vocabulary). Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated spec polish from
daily-regenpre-flight.Spec:
waterfall-basicWhat changed
featurestag fromsequentialtostepwiseto match spec-tags-generator vocabularyWhy
The specification vocabulary recommends
stepwiseas the established term for charts that progress through sequential steps. This aligns the tag with the canonical tagging guidance.Hard guarantees from the prompt
id,issue,createdunchangedupdatedbumped to current UTCAwaiting human review. The skip-gate in
daily-regenwill preventadditional auto-polish PRs for this spec while this one is open.