-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 98
Add FUSE3 support and TANDBERG LTO-6 HH drive #590
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hello @mhorimoto ! Thank you for opening this PR! Seems good so far, I will continue reviewing, but I think we may need to also add from LTO-5 to LTO-9, within the same format you used.
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hello @Piloalucard san. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ enum { | |
| VENDOR_IBM, | ||
| VENDOR_HP, | ||
| VENDOR_QUANTUM, | ||
| VENDOR_TANDBERG, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| enum { | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hard remove also does not seem deprecated but discouraged.
TBD if this is an issue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for investigating this. I will wait for your findings on whether
hard_remove causes any issues. Please let me know and I will update accordingly.