Skip to content

Conversation

@mtfishman
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 23, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.53846% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.11%. Comparing base (4ee09d2) to head (21c1476).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/BlockArraysExtensions/blockedunitrange.jl 84.37% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/abstractblocksparsearray/views.jl 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #157      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.86%   77.11%   +2.24%     
==========================================
  Files          36       36              
  Lines        1973     2014      +41     
==========================================
+ Hits         1477     1553      +76     
+ Misses        496      461      -35     
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 7.26% <0.00%> (-0.15%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mtfishman mtfishman changed the title [WIP] Generalize blockwise slicing Generalize blockwise slicing Jun 23, 2025
@mtfishman mtfishman marked this pull request as ready for review June 23, 2025 03:14
@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit 21eb0e9 into main Jun 23, 2025
20 checks passed
@mtfishman mtfishman deleted the mf/generalize_slicing branch June 23, 2025 17:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants