Skip to content

Conversation

@mtfishman
Copy link
Member

The strategy is to put off determining the algorithm type until right before the blocks are being factorized, instead of up front based on the block type.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.40%. Comparing base (33330bd) to head (dea2c79).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #154      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.97%   76.40%   +2.43%     
==========================================
  Files          36       36              
  Lines        1875     1916      +41     
==========================================
+ Hits         1387     1464      +77     
+ Misses        488      452      -36     
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 7.63% <0.00%> (-0.17%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit 47ad5ff into main Jun 20, 2025
20 checks passed
@mtfishman mtfishman deleted the mf/abstract_blocktype_factorizations branch June 20, 2025 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants