Skip to content

Add property to specify allowed providers in benchmarks#1290

Merged
jasonkatonica merged 2 commits intoIBM:java17from
KostasTsiounis:benchmark_providers_j17
Mar 25, 2026
Merged

Add property to specify allowed providers in benchmarks#1290
jasonkatonica merged 2 commits intoIBM:java17from
KostasTsiounis:benchmark_providers_j17

Conversation

@KostasTsiounis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A new command line property is introduced that allows one to specify the providers they want to run the benchmarks for. The property is -Djmh.allowedProviders= and accept a comma-separated list of provider names, as those are used in the benchmark parameters.

The Jenkins pipeline is updated to provide checkboxes to enable/disable providers used to run specified benchmarks.

Back-ported from: #1261

Signed-off-by: Kostas Tsiounis kostas.tsiounis@ibm.com

A new command line property is introduced that allows one
to specify the providers they want to run the benchmarks
for. The property is '-Djmh.allowedProviders=' and accept
a comma-separated list of provider names, as those are
used in the benchamark parameters.

The Jenkins pipeline is updated to provide checkboxes to
enable/disable providers used to run specified benchmarks.

Signed-off-by: Kostas Tsiounis <kostas.tsiounis@ibm.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jasonkatonica jasonkatonica left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Signed-off-by: Kostas Tsiounis <kostas.tsiounis@ibm.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@taoliult taoliult left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jasonkatonica jasonkatonica merged commit 428740d into IBM:java17 Mar 25, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants