Skip to content

Conversation

@gitcommitshow
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@contributor-support-github-app

Thank you for contributing this PR.
Please sign the Contributor License Agreement (CLA) before merging.

@gitcommitshow gitcommitshow added bug Something isn't working Pending CLA and removed bug Something isn't working labels Aug 15, 2024
@contributor-support-github-app

Thank you @gitcommitshow for contributing this PR.
Please sign the Contributor License Agreement (CLA) before merging.

@contributor-support-github-app

Analysis Summary

The README.md file for gcs-cli currently serves as an internal development checklist rather than user-facing documentation. It completely lacks context about the project's purpose, installation instructions, or usage examples. This makes it very difficult for a new user or potential contributor to understand what the project is or how to get started. The content mixes feature lists with development tasks and bug reports, which violates the Diátaxis principle of maintaining clear boundaries between different types of information. The document needs a fundamental restructuring to be effective.

Objective Rating Score

Category Score (0-100)
Technical Accuracy Score 90
Comprehensibility Score 20
Overall Score 48

Mistake Counts:

  • Major Comprehensibility: 2
  • Comprehensibility: 2
  • Minor Technical Accuracy: 1

Actionable Suggestions

File: README.md

  1. Major Comprehensibility: Add a project description at the top. Explain what "Git-Commit-Show" is and what this CLI tool helps users do. This provides essential context (Explanation).
  2. Major Comprehensibility: Create dedicated sections for "Installation" and "Usage". Provide step-by-step instructions for users to install the tool and its dependencies, and show basic command examples (How-To Guide).
  3. Comprehensibility: Move the "TASKS" and "BUGS" sections to a separate CONTRIBUTING.md file or into the repository's issue tracker. This content is for contributors, not end-users, and should be separated.
  4. Comprehensibility: Rewrite the "Features" section to be more descriptive. Instead of a simple checklist, briefly explain what each feature does (e.g., "Stream masterclass videos directly in your media player").
  5. Minor Technical Accuracy: Correct the malformed markdown link for StreamLink. It should be [StreamLink](https://streamlink.github.io).

Strengths

  • The document provides a clear, albeit brief, list of the project's current and planned features.
  • It tracks development tasks and known bugs, which is useful for project management, even if misplaced in a README.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant