Skip to content

bump react-native-onyx to 3.0.24 #77736

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
nkdengineer wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

bump react-native-onyx to 3.0.24 #77736

nkdengineer wants to merge 2 commits into from
+6 −6

Conversation

@nkdengineer
Copy link
Contributor

@nkdengineer nkdengineer commented Dec 16, 2025

Explanation of Change

bump react-native-onyx to 3.0.24

Fixed Issues

$ #76015
PROPOSAL: #76015 (comment)

Tests

Precondition:

  • Turn off Submission frequency, Add approvals and Make or track payments in Workflows settings.
  • Attendee tracking is enabled in workspace settings > Rules.
  1. Open FAB > Create expense > Manual.
  2. Enter amount > Next.
  3. On confirm page, click To field.
  4. Enter any email and select the user.
  5. Verify that the Attendee field isn't displayed on the confirmation page
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same

QA Steps

Same as test

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-12-07.at.21.19.45.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-12-07.at.21.18.40.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-12-07.at.21.23.22.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-12-07.at.21.21.19.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-12-07.at.21.17.33.mov

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 16, 2025

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

nkdengineer
nkdengineer commented Dec 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
src/pages/Search/SearchPage.tsx
const [lastPaymentMethods] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.NVP_LAST_PAYMENT_METHOD, {canBeMissing: true});
const [currentDate] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.CURRENT_DATE, {canBeMissing: true});
const newReportID = generateReportID();
const newReportID = useMemo(() => generateReportID(), []);
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nkdengineer nkdengineer Dec 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eVoloshchak This change is needed to prevent the infinity rendering on SearchPage after our change.

Copy link
Contributor

@eVoloshchak eVoloshchak Dec 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nkdengineer, but why is there an infinity rendering after the changes to react-native-onyx?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@nkdengineer nkdengineer Dec 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because when the key is changed, we reset the result value then the SearchPage is rendered again --> generateReportID returns another reportID --> the key change --> the result is reset --> the component is rendered.

Copy link
Contributor

@eVoloshchak eVoloshchak Dec 22, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nkdengineer, I don't think that's the correct approach, this hard crashes the app if you don't wrap every usage of generateReportID with useMemo, we'd have to document this and track that it throughout the app. Let's revert the onyx PR and discuss a better approach

@nkdengineer nkdengineer marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2025 08:44
@nkdengineer nkdengineer requested review from a team as code owners December 16, 2025 08:44
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and eVoloshchak and removed request for a team and JmillsExpensify December 16, 2025 08:44
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 16, 2025

@eVoloshchak Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 16, 2025 •
edited by github-actions bot
Loading

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/pages/Search/SearchPage.tsx 26.81% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes

@nkdengineer nkdengineer mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2025
Closed
8 tasks
@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

eVoloshchak commented Dec 22, 2025

Let's put this on hold, 3.0.24 introduces a crash, Expensify/react-native-onyx#708 (comment)

Screen.Recording.2025-12-22.at.22.29.41.mov

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@eVoloshchak eVoloshchak Awaiting requested review from eVoloshchak

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@nkdengineer nkdengineer

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@nkdengineer @eVoloshchak