Skip to content

Fill CRUJRA DATM over Antarctica and Greenland with GSWP3 data#3773

Open
wwieder wants to merge 67 commits intoESCOMP:b4b-devfrom
wwieder:b4b-dev_CRUJRA
Open

Fill CRUJRA DATM over Antarctica and Greenland with GSWP3 data#3773
wwieder wants to merge 67 commits intoESCOMP:b4b-devfrom
wwieder:b4b-dev_CRUJRA

Conversation

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

@wwieder wwieder commented Feb 19, 2026

Description of changes

Fills in missing DATM data from CRUJRA_v2 over Antarctica and addresses potential climate biases (snow hole) over N. Greenland with data from GSWP3.

Specific notes

fixes #2989

slevis-lmwg and others added 30 commits February 2, 2026 18:56
Update CISM to latest version with answer changes

Update the CISM submodule to the latest tag used in cesm3_0_beta0b. This includes cismwrap_2_2_012 and cismwrap_2_2_013, both of which includes answer changes for CISM due to changes in namelist defaults. Add a new test for running both Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets. Add new compsets for CISM with Clm60.
Merge b4b-dev to master

slevis resolved conflicts:
doc/ChangeLog
doc/ChangeSum
…eded and not getting it from the CPL, update comments around this as well
ctsm5.4.017: Introduce CRUJRA2024b datm option (Greenland snow hole filled)
samsrabin and others added 23 commits February 11, 2026 17:28
…e been there, so removing the extra lines that shouldn't have been there
From review

Co-authored-by: Samuel Levis <slevis@ucar.edu>
ctsm5.4.018: Quick fix so that we can use Nitrogen Deposition sent from the ATM model
Quick fix so that we can use ndep sent from ATM

Add the ndep_inparm namelist to drv_flds_in, so that CTSM can turn on ndep from the ATM model. Also turn on using the ndep from the ATM model for the cam LndTuningMode testmods. And make sure ndep comes from CAM when we are coupled to CAM.
…eaner4

ctsm5.4.019: Fix years used by generate_gdds
Fix years used by generate_gdds
ctsm5.4.020: Update namelist defaults: paramfile, rh_hgh, defo_fire_precip_thresh_bet, initial conditions
@wwieder wwieder requested a review from slevis-lmwg February 19, 2026 21:03
@wwieder wwieder added the bfb bit-for-bit label Feb 19, 2026
@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Contributor

@wwieder did you start the new branch from master in your local area? If so, I think all the "other" diffs that show up here will disappear when you merge the latest b4b-dev AFTER Erik completes the b4b-dev update today or tomorrow

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor Author

wwieder commented Feb 19, 2026

oh, yeah I started from master.... let's work on this after b4b dev gets merged. I may need handholding to rebase.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Ready to start (or start again) in CTSM: Upcoming tags Feb 19, 2026
@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg moved this from Ready to start (or start again) to In progress - b4b-dev in CTSM: Upcoming tags Feb 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bfb bit-for-bit

Projects

Status: In progress - b4b-dev

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants