cam6_4_153: Short-lived halogen chemistry#1470
cam6_4_153: Short-lived halogen chemistry#1470fvitt merged 15 commits intoESCOMP:cam_developmentfrom
Conversation
new file: cime_config/testdefs/testmods_dirs/cam/ts_slh_mam4_outfrq9s/shell_commands new file: cime_config/testdefs/testmods_dirs/cam/ts_slh_mam4_outfrq9s/user_nl_cam new file: cime_config/testdefs/testmods_dirs/cam/ts_slh_mam4_outfrq9s/user_nl_clm new file: cime_config/testdefs/testmods_dirs/cam/wa_slh_mam4_outfrq9s/shell_commands new file: cime_config/testdefs/testmods_dirs/cam/wa_slh_mam4_outfrq9s/user_nl_cam new file: cime_config/testdefs/testmods_dirs/cam/wa_slh_mam4_outfrq9s/user_nl_clm
|
From @RafaPedroFernandez (CC'd @CAlbertoCuevas): Please note that I have just made a push for 2 F90 routines in my following GIT: Which is also updated local in derecho: Routines are mo_gas_phase_chmdr.F90 Including snow in the variable makes the iodine deposition too efficient, and then we created a new array (ONLYICE) just to compute iodine wet-depositions without affecting other model developments. |
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/chemistry.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_gas_phase_chemdr.F90
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_usrrxt.F90
cacraigucar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Partial review - @jimmielin will be reviewing the chemistry section of this PR. My review was on the setup side.
I noticed that there are testing use_cases setup, but I do not see any regression tests being added. Is this an oversight?
modified: bld/namelist_files/namelist_defaults_cam.xml modified: bld/namelist_files/use_cases/2000_trop_strat_cam6_slh.xml modified: bld/namelist_files/use_cases/hist_trop_strat_cam6_slh.xml modified: bld/namelist_files/use_cases/hist_trop_strat_nudged_cam6_slh.xml modified: bld/namelist_files/use_cases/waccm_tsmlt_2000_cam6_slh.xml modified: bld/namelist_files/use_cases/waccm_tsmlt_hist_cam6_slh.xml modified: bld/namelist_files/use_cases/waccm_tsmlt_nudged_cam6_slh.xml
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/clybryiy_fam.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_slh_routines.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_srf_emissions.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_strato_rates.F90
modified: cime_config/config_compsets.xml modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_usrrxt.F90
modified: bld/namelist_files/namelist_definition.xml modified: src/chemistry/mozart/clybryiy_fam.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_slh_routines.F90
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/gas_wetdep_opts.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_chm_diags.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_drydep.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_gas_phase_chemdr.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_neu_wetdep.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_sad.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_usrrxt.F90
jimmielin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @fvitt and @RafaPedroFernandez for resolving my code review comments. I am happy to approve this now.
I have one remaining suggestion, in regards to the commented-out line of code, that perhaps could be documented better with an extra comment, if you would like to keep that line. But I do not need to review the PR again as it will just be a comment update.
Congratulations and thank you for bringing in SLH chemistry for CAM-chem, this is a great accomplishment.
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_slh_routines.F90
Closes #1469