Easy win per code owner

[nccatoni]

Motivation

Changes

Workflow

1. ⚠️ Create your PR as draft ⚠️
2. Work on you PR until the CI passes
3. Mark it as ready for review
   • Test logic is modified? -> Get a review from RFC owner.
   • Framework is modified, or non obvious usage of it -> get a review from R&P team

🚀 Once your PR is reviewed and the CI green, you can merge it!

🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟

Reviewer checklist

• Anything but tests/ or manifests/ is modified ? I have the approval from R&P team
• A docker base image is modified?
  • the relevant build-XXX-image label is present
• A scenario is added, removed or renamed?
  • Get a review from R&P team

[github-actions]

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

utils/scripts/activate_easy_wins/_internal/logger.py                    @DataDog/system-tests-core
.github/workflows/nightly.yml                                           @DataDog/system-tests-core
tests/test_the_test/test_easy_win.py                                    @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/const/_const.py                                                   @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/scripts/activate_easy_wins/__main__.py                            @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/scripts/activate_easy_wins/_internal/const.py                     @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/scripts/activate_easy_wins/_internal/core.py                      @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/scripts/activate_easy_wins/_internal/manifest_editor.py           @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/scripts/activate_easy_wins/_internal/test_artifact.py             @DataDog/system-tests-core
utils/scripts/activate_easy_wins/_internal/types.py                     @DataDog/system-tests-core

[datadog-prod-us1-3]

✅ Tests

🎉 All green!

❄️ No new flaky tests detected
🧪 All tests passed

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 0174f35 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Was this helpful? React with 👍/👎 or give us feedback!}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 0174f356cd

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Activate multi-owner tests for each owner branch

When --split-co is enabled, owner filtering keeps only the first sorted owner for each test (ref_owner) and skips all other owners. If a test report contains multiple owners in metadata.owners, only one owner branch gets the activation and the other owner-specific PRs silently miss that test. This breaks the per-code-owner split for shared ownership cases.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Restore split-co loop to a stable base commit

Using git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD can return HEAD in detached-head runs; in that case, git checkout back to base_branch after the first owner commit does not return to the original baseline and subsequent owner branches are generated from already-modified history. This can mix activations across owners whenever the script is executed from a detached checkout (a common CI execution mode).

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.