-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
[crashtracking] Document runtime stacks collection #1410
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1410 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 71.41% 71.42%
=======================================
Files 411 411
Lines 66047 66047
=======================================
+ Hits 47168 47173 +5
+ Misses 18879 18874 -5
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
BenchmarksComparisonBenchmark execution time: 2026-01-06 15:09:53 Comparing candidate commit 0ae0fc3 in PR branch Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 57 metrics, 2 unstable metrics. CandidateCandidate benchmark detailsGroup 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 4
Group 5
Group 6
Group 7
Group 8
Group 9
Group 10
Group 11
Group 12
Group 13
Group 14
Group 15
Group 16
Group 17
Group 18
Group 19
BaselineOmitted due to size. |
0a8b343 to
59977fb
Compare
Artifact Size Benchmark Reportaarch64-alpine-linux-musl
aarch64-apple-darwin
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
libdatadog-x64-windows
libdatadog-x86-windows
x86_64-alpine-linux-musl
x86_64-apple-darwin
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
|

What does this PR do?
We should document high level motivation and decisions made around runtime stack collection callback registration
Motivation
What inspired you to submit this pull request?
Additional Notes
Anything else we should know when reviewing?
How to test the change?
Describe here in detail how the change can be validated.