Stores remote config requests in request-replayer

[dubloom]

Description

Process_tags will be added to remote config in a follow-up PR.
To test the feature we need to do something like that:

try {
    $request = $rr->waitForRequest(function($req) {
        return strpos($req["uri"], '/v0.7/config') !== false;
    });
    $body = json_decode($request["body"], true);
} catch (Exception $e) {
    echo "ERROR: No RC request found\n";
    exit(1);
}

if (!isset($body["client"]["client_tracer"]["process_tags"])) {
    echo "ERROR: Missing 'process_tags' field\n";
    exit(1);
}

echo $body["client"]["client_tracer"]["process_tags"];
del_rc_file($path);

However, until this PR, RC requests were not stored which was making a test like that impossible.
This PR therefore stores the RC requests so we can retrieve them in tests.

Reviewer checklist

• Test coverage seems ok.
• Appropriate labels assigned.

[datadog-official]

⚠️ Tests

✨ Fix all issues with Cursor

⚠️ Warnings

🧪 1027 Tests failed

testSearchPhpBinaries from integration.DDTrace\Tests\Integration\PHPInstallerTest (Datadog) (Fix with Cursor)

DDTrace\Tests\Integration\PHPInstallerTest::testSearchPhpBinaries
Test code or tested code printed unexpected output: Searching for available php binaries, this operation might take a while.

    testSimplePushAndProcess from laravel-58-test.DDTrace\Tests\Integrations\Laravel\V5_8\QueueTest (Fix with Cursor)

testSimplePushAndProcess from laravel-8x-test.DDTrace\Tests\Integrations\Laravel\V8_x\QueueTest (Datadog) (Fix with Cursor)

DDTrace\Tests\Integrations\Laravel\V8_x\QueueTest::testSimplePushAndProcess
Test code or tested code printed unexpected output: spanLinksTraceId: 697c8644000000000e4c4feb1f433df6
tid: 697c864400000000
hexProcessTraceId: 0e4c4feb1f433df6
hexProcessSpanId: bc7d7975ac6915b6
processTraceId: 1030286286021410294
processSpanId: 13582145597529986486

View all

ℹ️ Info

❄️ No new flaky tests detected

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 33c76cc | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Was this helpful? Give us feedback!}

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.11%. Comparing base (ff8f987) to head (33c76cc).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3585      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.24%   62.11%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         141      141              
  Lines       13387    13387              
  Branches     1753     1753              
==========================================
- Hits         8333     8315      -18     
- Misses       4257     4273      +16     
- Partials      797      799       +2     

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ff8f987...33c76cc. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.