Skip to content

Support x-keep-typed-in-additional-properties in Rust model generator#1730

Open
charlie-zhang109 wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
czhang/typed-fields-in-additional-properties
Open

Support x-keep-typed-in-additional-properties in Rust model generator#1730
charlie-zhang109 wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
czhang/typed-fields-in-additional-properties

Conversation

@charlie-zhang109
Copy link
Copy Markdown

What does this PR do?

When a schema sets x-keep-typed-in-additional-properties: true (introduced in DataDog/datadog-api-spec#5941), the Rust model generator pre-inserts every JSON key into additional_properties before the match dispatch in deserialize. Previously, only the &_ catch-all arm (unknown keys) populated the map.

The first consumer is UsageSummaryDate, UsageSummaryDateOrg, and UsageSummaryResponse. After this change, every field on those models is accessible from additional_properties regardless of when it was added to the spec.

Typed field accessors are unchanged — this is additive only.

Companion PRs:

Review checklist

  • This PR includes all newly recorded cassettes for any modified tests.

  • This PR does not rely on API client schema changes.

    • The CI should be fully passing.
  • Or, this PR relies on API schema changes and this is a Draft PR to include tests for that new functionality.

When a schema sets `x-keep-typed-in-additional-properties: true`, pre-insert
every key into `additional_properties` before the match dispatch so typed and
untyped fields are both accessible from a single map.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
charlie-zhang109

This comment was marked as resolved.

charlie-zhang109 and others added 2 commits June 8, 2026 10:11
…rde_json::Value

Add inline comment explaining that deserializing into serde_json::Value always
succeeds, so the Ok branch always fires. The guard future-proofs against typed
additionalProperties schemas where the conversion could fail.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…comment

"future-proofs" implied graceful handling; the comment now accurately notes
that a type mismatch silently drops the entry, same as the catch-all arm.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@charlie-zhang109 charlie-zhang109 marked this pull request as ready for review June 8, 2026 15:23
@charlie-zhang109 charlie-zhang109 requested review from a team as code owners June 8, 2026 15:23
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pipelines

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 1 Pipeline job failed

Ensure labels | changelog   View in Datadog   GitHub Actions

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 269f2ab | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant