Skip to content

Conversation

@cdecker
Copy link
Collaborator

@cdecker cdecker commented Dec 20, 2024

This should get the couple of nodes that are stuck on a large
commitment TX fee unstuck. We triple the feerate in order to not run
into the deadlock, and we make the policy failure a warning instead.

This is not a solution to #538, since it is just a one-time adjustment. Ideally we'd have an independent feerate oracle that VLS can query independently.

This should get the couple of nodes that are stuck on a large
commitment TX fee unstuck. We triple the feerate in order to not run
into the deadlock, and we make the policy failure a warning instead.

Once VLS reimplements the per-payment fee budget we should be able to
tighten these again.
@cdecker cdecker force-pushed the 202451-fee-range-bump branch from 43f8fb3 to 9214996 Compare December 20, 2024 14:09
@cdecker cdecker merged commit 883ef3b into main Dec 20, 2024
12 checks passed
@cdecker cdecker deleted the 202451-fee-range-bump branch December 20, 2024 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants