Skip to content

Conversation

@AlejandroEsquivel
Copy link
Member

TLDR

Dive Deeper

Reviewer Test Plan

Testing Matrix

🍏 πŸͺŸ 🐧
npm run ❓ ❓ ❓
npx ❓ ❓ ❓
Docker ❓ ❓ ❓
Podman ❓ - -
Seatbelt ❓ - -

Linked issues / bugs

@cubeorgdev
Copy link

cubeorgdev bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Mention Cube like a regular teammate with your question or request:

@cube review this pull request
@cube make the following changes ...
@cube create an issue from what was mentioned in the following comment ...
@cube explain the following code ...
@cube are there any security or performance concerns?


Powered by Blocks | πŸ“š Documentation | βš™οΈ Toggle this message

πŸ’‘ Run @blocks /help for more information about available commands and features.

@blocksuser
Copy link

@cube does this change make sense?

@cubeorgdev
Copy link

cubeorgdev bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Review of PR #4: Update README.md

After reviewing the changes in this pull request, I can see that the only modification is adding "(Updated)" to the main title of the README, changing it from:

# Gemini CLI

to:

# Gemini CLI (Updated)

Analysis

Does this change make sense? Not really, for several reasons:

  1. Lack of Context: The change doesn't provide meaningful information. Simply adding "(Updated)" to the title doesn't tell users what was updated, when, or why. README titles should be stable and descriptive of the project itself.

  2. Version Control Already Tracks Updates: Git itself tracks when files are updated through commit history. Adding "(Updated)" to the title is redundant and doesn't follow common documentation practices.

  3. No Semantic Value: The change doesn't improve the documentation or provide any value to users. If there were significant updates to the CLI or documentation, those should be reflected in:

    • A changelog section
    • Version badges (which already exist)
    • Specific sections mentioning new features
    • Release notes
  4. Breaks Convention: Most open-source projects maintain clean, consistent titles. Adding temporal indicators like "(Updated)" in the main title is unconventional and could confuse users.

Recommendation

This change should not be merged as-is. If the goal is to indicate recent updates to the project, consider these alternatives:

  • Add a "What's New" or "Recent Updates" section in the README
  • Update the version badges that are already present
  • Create a CHANGELOG.md file to track updates
  • Use GitHub releases to announce major updates
  • Add a "Last Updated" timestamp if absolutely necessary, but place it elsewhere in the document

The PR also lacks any description of why this change was made, which makes it difficult to understand the intent behind it.

@blocksuser
Copy link

@blocks does trhis change make sense?

@blocksorg
Copy link

blocksorg bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Unable to fulfill this request because your GitHub account is not associated with this workspace. Please link your account in the workspace settings.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Size Change: -2 B (0%)

Total Size: 13.2 MB

ℹ️ View Unchanged
Filename Size Change
./bundle/gemini.js 13.2 MB -2 B (0%)
./bundle/sandbox-macos-permissive-closed.sb 1.03 kB 0 B
./bundle/sandbox-macos-permissive-open.sb 830 B 0 B
./bundle/sandbox-macos-permissive-proxied.sb 1.31 kB 0 B
./bundle/sandbox-macos-restrictive-closed.sb 3.29 kB 0 B
./bundle/sandbox-macos-restrictive-open.sb 3.36 kB 0 B
./bundle/sandbox-macos-restrictive-proxied.sb 3.56 kB 0 B

compressed-size-action

@blocksuser
Copy link

@cube does this change make sense?

@cubeorgdev
Copy link

cubeorgdev bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Unable to fulfill this request because your GitHub account is not associated with this workspace. Please link your account in the workspace settings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants