fix(e2e): lower EXPECTED_BLOCKS_PER_CHECKPOINT in pipelining test#22468
Closed
AztecBot wants to merge 1 commit intomerge-train/spartanfrom
Closed
fix(e2e): lower EXPECTED_BLOCKS_PER_CHECKPOINT in pipelining test#22468AztecBot wants to merge 1 commit intomerge-train/spartanfrom
AztecBot wants to merge 1 commit intomerge-train/spartanfrom
Conversation
AztecBot
added
ci-draft
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The
epochs_mbps.pipeline.parallel.test.tstest was failing becauseEXPECTED_BLOCKS_PER_CHECKPOINTwas set to 12, but CI consistently produces only 11 blocks in the best checkpoint due to sequencer startup overhead eating into the 72s slot duration (11 blocks × 5.5s = 60.5s, leaving only 11.5s for overhead which is too tight for 12 blocks).Lowered
EXPECTED_BLOCKS_PER_CHECKPOINTfrom 12 to 6 — still validates MBPS behavior while being robust to timing variance in CI.CI failure: http://ci.aztec-labs.com/1775833083455293
ClaudeBox log: https://claudebox.work/s/759dad220d8acad7?run=1