Conversation
WalkthroughAdds a new ABSProvider for "AtCoder Beginners Selection", registers it in provider presets/groups, expands test fixtures and Prisma data for ABS tasks, and introduces a comprehensive ABS-focused test suite and test plan documenting expected behaviors and verification steps. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/lib/utils/contest_table_provider.ts (1)
136-163: LGTM! ABSProvider follows established patterns.The implementation is consistent with similar single-contest providers like
Typical90Provider. The filter condition correctly usesclassifyContestto matchContestType.ABS, and the display configuration appropriately hides headers and round labels since ABS is a single collection of problems.One minor style suggestion: consider prefixing the unused
contestIdparameter with an underscore to indicate it's intentionally unused.- getContestRoundLabel(contestId: string): string { + getContestRoundLabel(_contestId: string): string { return ''; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
docs/dev-notes/2025-12-11/add_tests_for_contest_table_provider/plan.md(1 hunks)prisma/contest_task_pairs.ts(1 hunks)prisma/tasks.ts(2 hunks)src/lib/utils/contest_table_provider.ts(3 hunks)src/test/lib/utils/contest_table_provider.test.ts(3 hunks)src/test/lib/utils/test_cases/contest_table_provider.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
src/test/lib/utils/test_cases/contest_table_provider.ts (1)
src/lib/types/task.ts (1)
TaskResults(74-74)
src/lib/utils/contest_table_provider.ts (3)
src/lib/types/task.ts (1)
TaskResult(64-72)src/lib/utils/contest.ts (1)
classifyContest(5-97)src/lib/types/contest_table_provider.ts (2)
ContestTableMetaData(122-125)ContestTableDisplayConfig(149-155)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
docs/dev-notes/2025-12-11/add_tests_for_contest_table_provider/plan.md
395-395: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: preview
🔇 Additional comments (8)
prisma/tasks.ts (1)
4512-4574: ABS source problem entries look consistent and correctThe added task records for the ABS component problems (abc088_b, abc087_b, arc089_a, abc086_a, abc085_c, abc085_b, abc083_b, abc081_b, abc081_a, arc065_a) use the expected
id, originalcontest_id,problem_index, and titles, and fit the existing schema without introducing new fields. No issues from a data- or type-consistency perspective.Also applies to: 4610-4616
prisma/contest_task_pairs.ts (1)
2-51: ABS contest-task mappings are coherent with the ABS problem listThe new
contest_task_pairsentries forcontest_id: 'abs'correctly remap the underlying problems (practice_1 excluded because it is already native toabs) to indices B–K in the documented ABS order. This is consistent with the task IDs added inprisma/tasks.tsand with how other virtual contests are modeled.src/test/lib/utils/test_cases/contest_table_provider.ts (1)
419-449: ABS test data block is well-structured and consistentThe ABS test dataset (abs_a–abs_k) cleanly mirrors the real ABS problem set: correct
taskId/taskTableIndexmapping, ordered A–K, and a deliberate mix of statuses (AC/AC_WITH_EDITORIAL/TRYING/PENDING) useful for exercising provider behavior. It follows the existingcreateContestTaskspattern and integrates cleanly via thetaskResultsForABSexport.src/lib/utils/contest_table_provider.ts (2)
919-926: LGTM! Preset registration is correct.The ABS preset follows the same pattern as other single-provider groups (e.g.,
Typical90,MathAndAlgorithm). The button label is appropriately concise, and the aria label provides accessibility context.
1073-1073: LGTM! ABS group exported correctly.The
abskey is appropriately registered and follows the naming convention used by other groups.src/test/lib/utils/contest_table_provider.test.ts (3)
7-7: LGTM! Imports updated correctly.The
ABSProviderandtaskResultsForABSimports are properly added to support the new test suite.Also applies to: 35-35
43-45: LGTM! Mock updated correctly.The mock correctly handles the
'abs'contest ID before checkingstartsWith('abc'), which ensures proper classification since 'abs' starts with 'ab' but should not match the ABC pattern.
205-325: LGTM! Comprehensive ABS test suite.The test suite provides excellent coverage:
- Filtering logic validated with both pure ABS and mixed contest data
- All metadata and display configuration values verified
- Table structure confirmed to have all 11 problems (A-K)
- Multi-source verification at lines 289-310 is a thoughtful domain-specific test that confirms ABS problems originate from various AtCoder contests
- Empty input edge case properly handled
The tests follow the established patterns used by other provider tests in this file.
close #2919
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests
Chores
Documentation
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.